Net Change Limit of 300 Million ADA for Epochs 613–713

Rationale: The 300M ADA limit aligns with treasury inflows, promotes fiscal discipline, and sets a responsible spending boundary to support long-term ecosystem

Rationale: The DRep opposes the 300M ADA limit because it nearly matches projected treasury inflows, leaving no buffer for volatility or long-term reserves. They believe

Rationale: The DRep opposes increased spending limits because they believe current governance lacks accountability and a small group controls funds without demonstrating

Rationale: The DRep supports the proposal but suggests considering a lower net change limit of 250-275 million ADA instead of the proposed 300 million.

Rationale: The DRep supports the cap as it promotes responsible governance by aligning spending with historical inflows while maintaining voter control over decisions.

Rationale: The DRep supports limiting spending to stay below previous year's inflows as a necessary austerity measure during difficult economic times for the ecosystem.